Davies Meyer – home
    AI3 min read

    Research Agents

    Research agents are AI applications that work through research tasks in multiple steps, such as finding sources, comparing information and preparing a report. Their tools and assignment determine which data and research activities they can handle.

    Research Agents explained

    Start by turning a broad question into an assessable brief: which decision, market and time period does the work address? An agent can investigate subquestions and respond to new findings. A longer report does not necessarily provide better understanding.

    Research using existing sources differs from primary research. An agent reviewing competitor websites has not interviewed customers. A generated questionnaire is not a completed field study; an interview summary replaces neither the interview nor a justified sample.

    Assessment depends on connecting each claim to its supporting material. Keep company statements, independently collected data and your own conclusions distinguishable. Preserve contradictions and gaps instead of smoothing them into a confident narrative.

    In Creative Engineering, AI can structure information work and create room for better questions and interpretation. We assess quality and economics through usable results, including verification effort. We take responsibility for the concept and quality.

    Examples

    Hypothetical application

    A team compares packaging claims in retail. A research agent records statements from a defined set of product pages, with sources and dates, and flags missing substantiation. This provides material for strategy work; it does not establish which packaging consumers prefer.

    Key Points

    • The assignment and data access define the scope.
    • Distinguish desk research from new data collection.
    • Check the source against the specific claim.
    • Keep unanswered questions visible.

    Practical application

    Define questions, source scope and output format first. Require a supporting passage for decision-relevant claims and separate observation, interpretation and recommendation. Have the result assessed before using it to justify a decision.

    Useful measures

    Substantiation

    Decision-relevant claims with appropriate, verified supporting evidence.

    Coverage

    Answered subquestions and remaining gaps.

    Effort to usable output

    Research, verification and correction required for decision support.

    Common mistakes

    • Presenting a sourced assertion as an independently collected finding.
    • Equating source volume with evidential strength.
    • Measuring generation time alone.

    Sources and context

    Frequently Asked Questions about Research Agents

    The label alone does not establish that. Individual activities may be supported or automated. A credible study still needs a suitable design, appropriate data and expert interpretation.

    Loading related terms…

    All Terms